Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Madison Sieg vs Merel Hoedt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sieg vs Hoedt analysis and find out who is favored!
Madison Sieg vs Merel Hoedt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sieg 2 - 0 Hoedt
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sieg has won 45.16% of points on their second serve, while Hoedt has won 41.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sieg, in recent form, has won 53.21% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hoedt has won 57.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.04% and 43.59% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sieg has saved 51.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hoedt has saved 52.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sieg has won 57.58% of matches played (W/L 38/ 28), with Hoedt winning 60.29% (W/L 41/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sieg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 47/ 37). Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 105/ 81), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Sieg has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.46% of matches (W/L 38/ 27), where as Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sieg winning 2 times and Hoedt being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Sieg winning 4 and Hoedt winning 1. The last match between Sieg and Hoedt was at the W35 Bastad, 07-05-2024, First, Clay with Madison Sieg getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sieg and Hoedt have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sieg winning 1 times and Hoedt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sieg winning 0, and Hoedt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sieg has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.52 while Hoedt has played against players with an average rank of 185.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sieg has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hoedt has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sieg has converted 52.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hoedt has converted 51.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
312
Rank
312
High
20
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
522
Rank
468
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
57% (79-60)
Career Total W/L
55% (162-133)
46% (11-13)
YTD W/L
57% (16-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Madison Sieg | Merel Hoedt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 26 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:13:0 | 2:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (95/150) | 67% (97/145) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (52/95) | 57% (55/97) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (33/55) | 38% (18/48) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 52% (11/21) | 50% (7/14) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (72/145) | 43% (65/150) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 6-1 2-6 6-4 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Madison Sieg | Merel Hoedt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 46% (11/13) | 57% (16/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (24/28) | 60% (37/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (228/253) | 54% (311/261) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 59% (10/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.64 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 179 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:27 | 1:52:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 241.63 | 250.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1070/1597) | 66% (1186/1799) |
| 1st Serve W% | 56% (600/1070) | 62% (730/1186) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (238/527) | 41% (252/613) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (93/176) | 52% (140/271) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (672/1499) | 49% (943/1930) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (11/12) | 56% (9/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (10/23) | 57% (16/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 17% (1/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 8% (12/1) |
Madison Sieg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Madison Sieg
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
3 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Daria Yesypchuk
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
86%
(
44 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Madison Sieg
51%
(
57 of
111)
1st Serve %
79%
(
75 of
95)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
49 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johanne Svendsen
Player
Madison Sieg
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Elena-Teodora Cadar
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
87%
(
75 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Madison Sieg
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Ana Candiotto
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Madison Sieg
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Merel Hoedt
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Angelina Wirges
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Anna Klasen
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sina Herrmann
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
18
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
52%
(
47 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tilde Stromquist
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Merel Hoedt
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
2
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
25
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
57%
(
49 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Stephanie Judith Visscher
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Natalia Kowalczyk
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
28%
(
19 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sieg Vs Hoedt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
